FWMMX
Price
$68.49
Change
-$0.77 (-1.11%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Net Assets
209.48B
TRCPX
Price
$23.82
Change
-$2.20 (-8.46%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Net Assets
6.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWMMX vs TRCPX

Header iconFWMMX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs TRCPXBanner chart's image
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-2
Price$68.49
Change-$0.77 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
Nuveen Large Cap Value Premier
Price$23.82
Change-$2.20 (-8.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
FWMMX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 107.88B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 6.27B to 209.48B. FWMMX holds the highest valuation in this group at 209.48B. The lowest valued company is TRCPX at 6.27B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 13%. TRCPX experienced the highest price growth at 2%, while FWMMX experienced the biggest fall at 1%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. TRCPX (6.32B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than TRCPX: FWMMX (1.35) vs TRCPX (1.13). FWMMX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: FWMMX (5 years) vs TRCPX (16 years). TRCPX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TRCPX (19.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: TRCPX (0) vs FWMMX (250). TRCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.87 vs. FWMMX (7.55). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 50.87 vs. TRCPX (47.70).
FWMMXTRCPXFWMMX / TRCPX
Total Expense Ratio0.350.5662%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.350.5662%
Fund Existence5 years16 years-
Gain YTD13.76618.00576%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment2500-
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets209B6.32B3,305%
Annual Yield % from dividends1.351.13119%
Returns for 1 year7.5513.8754%
Returns for 3 years34.3738.2190%
Returns for 5 years50.8747.70107%
Returns for 10 yearsN/A80.38-
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGMSP3.730.22
+6.27%
Bio Green Med Solution Inc
TSHA5.760.20
+3.60%
Taysha Gene Therapies
PNFP101.061.12
+1.12%
Pinnacle Financial Partners
RNGR14.390.10
+0.70%
Ranger Energy Services
CELU1.67-0.12
-6.70%
Celularity