Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSECX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-2
Price$66.17
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$16.33
Change-$1.62 (-9.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.94B
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. RSECX (2.94B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWMMX (1.41) vs RSECX (0.09). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWMMX (5 years) vs RSECX (14 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSECX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. RSECX (-0.40). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. RSECX (4.88).
| FWMMX | RSECX | FWMMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.85 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.503 | 0.123 | 1,226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208B | 2.94B | 7,087% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.09 | 1,659% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | -0.40 | -1,361% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.37 | 23.20 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.53 | 4.88 | 831% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers