Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSECX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-2
Price$66.89
Change-$0.96 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$17.94
Change-$0.27 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.27B
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. RSECX (3.27B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWMMX (1.38) vs RSECX (0.04). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWMMX (5 years) vs RSECX (13 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSECX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.92 vs. RSECX (-0.40). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 49.06 vs. RSECX (29.56).
| FWMMX | RSECX | FWMMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.85 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.873 | 13.599 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 3.27B | 6,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.04 | 3,560% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | -0.40 | -990% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.75 | 34.43 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.06 | 29.56 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement