Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSEAX
FWMMX vs RSEAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSEAX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-2
Price$66.89
Change-$0.96 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity A
Price$18.43
Change-$0.28 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.27B
FWMMX vs RSEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. RSEAX (3.27B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: FWMMX (1.38) vs RSEAX (0.50). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSEAX: FWMMX (5 years) vs RSEAX (13 years). RSEAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSEAX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. RSEAX (0.58). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 51.20 vs. RSEAX (34.03).
| FWMMX | RSEAX | FWMMX / RSEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.10 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.20 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.450 | 14.334 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 3.27B | 6,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.50 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 0.58 | 913% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.78 | 37.81 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.20 | 34.03 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement