Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs HWLZX
FWMMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs HWLZX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-2
Price$68.41
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
Price$47.54
Change+$0.69 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.19M
FWMMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. HWLZX (360M). HWLZX pays higher dividends than FWMMX: HWLZX (1.48) vs FWMMX (1.35). FWMMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FWMMX (5 years) vs HWLZX (6 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FWMMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. HWLZX (-2.01). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 48.37 vs. HWLZX (44.20).
| FWMMX | HWLZX | FWMMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.85 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.811 | 13.482 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 360M | 58,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.48 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | -2.01 | -234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.67 | 9.58 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.37 | 44.20 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement