Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs RNPAX
FWIFX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs RNPAX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide I
Price$39.01
Change+$0.20 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$66.68
Change+$0.35 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.61B
FWIFX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FWIFX (3.39B). FWIFX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: FWIFX (0.72) vs RNPAX (0.00). FWIFX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: FWIFX (17 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FWIFX (0.72). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPAX: FWIFX (0) vs RNPAX (250). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. FWIFX (-0.93). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.61 vs. FWIFX (23.15).
| FWIFX | RNPAX | FWIFX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.558 | 16.921 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 161B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.93 | 9.60 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.48 | 57.78 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 34.61 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.67 | 99.83 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers