Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TRFM
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$92.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.57%)
Volume$21.98K
Net Assets876.43M
AAM Transformers ETF
Price$44.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.48%)
Volume$3.86K
Net Assets70.99M
FWD vs TRFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TRFM commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a StrongBuy and TRFM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 876M vs. TRFM (71M). TRFM (16.936) and FWD (16.474) have matching annual dividend yield . FWD was incepted earlier than TRFM: FWD (2 years) vs TRFM (3 years). TRFM (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover TRFM (84.00) vs TRFM (84.00).
| FWD | TRFM | FWD / TRFM | |
| Gain YTD | 16.474 | 16.936 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 876M | 71M | 1,234% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 84.00 | 194% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| JCI - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
More | ||||
TRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been closely correlated with MTSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then MTSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFM | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| MTSI - TRFM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| APH - TRFM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ARM - TRFM | 77% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| SITM - TRFM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| FORM - TRFM | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||