Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TRFM
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$112.07
Change-$0.74 (-0.66%)
Volume$500
Net Assets1.41B
AAM Transformers ETF
Price$50.39
Change-$0.17 (-0.34%)
Volume$15.9K
Net Assets114.87M
FWD vs TRFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TRFM commentary
Jan 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and TRFM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.41B vs. TRFM (115M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than TRFM: FWD (8.045) vs TRFM (5.750). FWD was incepted earlier than TRFM: FWD (3 years) vs TRFM (4 years). TRFM (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover TRFM (84.00) vs TRFM (84.00).
| FWD | TRFM | FWD / TRFM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.045 | 5.750 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 115M | 1,226% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 84.00 | 194% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| MTZ - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +6.31% | ||
More | ||||
TRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been closely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFM | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| ARM - TRFM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| GEV - TRFM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| RBRK - TRFM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| LIF - TRFM | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ALAB - TRFM | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
More | ||||