Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs PCGG
FWD vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs PCGG
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$111.99
Change+$6.46 (+6.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.47B
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$11.18
Change-$1.31 (-10.49%)
Volume$22.61K
Net Assets181.77M
FWD vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. PCGG commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and PCGG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.47B vs. PCGG (182M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: FWD (8.285) vs PCGG (-3.425). FWD was incepted earlier than PCGG: FWD (3 years) vs PCGG (2 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). FWD has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| FWD | PCGG | FWD / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.285 | -3.425 | -242% |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 182M | 808% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.85 | 76% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 17.61 | 926% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| MTZ - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +8.06% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| V - PCGG | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.73% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SHOP - PCGG | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.08% | ||
More | ||||