Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs GSFP
FWD vs GSFP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. GSFP commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and GSFP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 936M vs. GSFP (10.8M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than GSFP: FWD (18.078) vs GSFP (10.378). FWD was incepted earlier than GSFP: FWD (2 years) vs GSFP (4 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than GSFP (0.75). FWD has a higher turnover GSFP (33.00) vs GSFP (33.00).
| FWD | GSFP | FWD / GSFP | |
| Gain YTD | 18.078 | 10.378 | 174% |
| Net Assets | 936M | 10.8M | 8,667% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 33.00 | 494% |
| Yield | 0.01 | 0.99 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | GSFP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | about 1 month ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 81% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| COHR - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -19.61% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | -4.67% | ||
More | ||||
GSFP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSFP has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSFP jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSFP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSFP | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACM - GSFP | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| VLTO - GSFP | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| ETN - GSFP | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| BLD - GSFP | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| WMS - GSFP | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||