Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$34.05
Change-$2.56 (-6.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.58B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.69
Change-$2.65 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWCFX (3.58B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (1.24) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. FWCFX (4.75). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. FWCFX (2.58).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.45 | 404% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.45 | 404% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.463 | 1.630 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 13.29 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | 42.76 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | 18.14 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.05 | 131.36 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers