Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$34.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.95
Change+$0.34 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWCFX (3.39B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.72) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. FWCFX (2.19). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. FWCFX (12.04).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.824 | 15.974 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.19 | 15.49 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.62 | 49.63 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.04 | 36.59 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.34 | 100.52 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers