Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$35.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWCFX (3.51B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.70) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. FWCFX (-2.33). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. FWCFX (10.92).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.183 | 19.326 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | 13.09 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.41 | 62.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.92 | 36.47 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.07 | 100.70 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement