Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.46 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.50
Change-$0.81 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. FWCFX (3.08B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.77) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. FWCFX (-8.04). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.60 vs. FWCFX (18.90).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.879 | 8.801 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 151B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.04 | 9.22 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.18 | 43.84 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.90 | 49.60 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.64 | 78.80 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers