Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$33.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.49B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.55
Change-$0.32 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWCFX (3.49B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (1.27) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.28 vs. FWCFX (6.49). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.63 vs. FWCFX (2.86).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.271 | 2.849 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 19.28 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.07 | 49.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | 20.63 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.73 | 132.05 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers