Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$32.49
Change-$4.72 (-12.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$73.13
Change-$0.65 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWCFX (3.53B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.46) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. FWCFX (-2.41). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 25.76 vs. FWCFX (20.10).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.824 | 21.130 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.41 | 11.33 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.08 | 49.33 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.10 | 25.76 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.65 | 101.96 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement