Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$35.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$72.51
Change+$0.13 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a StrongBuy and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWCFX (3.51B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.46) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.66 vs. FWCFX (-2.55). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. FWCFX (10.67).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.932 | 19.044 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.55 | 12.66 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.07 | 61.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.67 | 34.72 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.71 | 97.52 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement