Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWBTX vs RLBCX
FWBTX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWBTX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income C
Price$15.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.25B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FWBTX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWBTX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWBTX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FWBTX (3.25B). FWBTX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FWBTX (2.82) vs RLBCX (1.46). FWBTX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FWBTX (10 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). FWBTX (1.84) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). FWBTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FWBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FWBTX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FWBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. RLBCX (9.58). FWBTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.56 vs. RLBCX (39.44).
| FWBTX | RLBCX | FWBTX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.89 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.89 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.909 | 15.928 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 1.46 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.16 | 9.58 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.53 | 42.30 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.56 | 39.44 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.70 | 74.61 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement