Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBAX
FWATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A
Price$16.01
Change+$0.13 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.99
Change-$0.59 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FWATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FWATX (3.39B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FWATX (3.43) vs RLBAX (1.22). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FWATX (10 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FWATX (1.09). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FWATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FWATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. RLBAX (10.45). FWATX return over 5 years is better than : 39.01 vs. RLBAX (31.35).
| FWATX | RLBAX | FWATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.362 | 2.371 | 142% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 1.22 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 10.45 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.88 | 33.63 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.01 | 31.35 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.54 | 79.34 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement