Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWATX vs RLBAX
FWATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A
Price$15.53
Change-$0.27 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.25B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FWATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FWATX (3.25B). FWATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FWATX (3.51) vs RLBAX (1.08). FWATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FWATX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FWATX (1.09). FWATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FWATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FWATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FWATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.23 vs. RLBAX (9.08). FWATX return over 5 years is better than : 50.93 vs. RLBAX (36.92).
| FWATX | RLBAX | FWATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.455 | 15.481 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 1.08 | 323% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.23 | 9.08 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.44 | 40.52 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.93 | 36.92 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.04 | 69.99 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement