Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.09
Change+$0.36 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$75.00
Change+$0.80 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (0.75) vs FWAFX (0.49). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. FWAFX (-1.08). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.74 vs. FWAFX (16.17).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.644 | 19.389 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.75 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | 13.16 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.29 | 62.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.17 | 36.74 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.20 | 101.14 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers