Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPGX
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$35.86
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$71.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
FWAFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Hold and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.53B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPGX (0.73) vs FWAFX (0.48). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. FWAFX (2.20). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.77 vs. FWAFX (9.02).
| FWAFX | RNPGX | FWAFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.41 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.018 | 14.610 | 34% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.73 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 12.05 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.03 | 54.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.02 | 22.77 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.36 | 99.95 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement