Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.71
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.53B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FWAFX (0.48). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. FWAFX (-1.91). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.98 vs. FWAFX (13.88).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.405 | 19.455 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.69 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 11.89 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.96 | 44.96 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 25.98 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.52 | 94.40 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement