Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$36.92
Change-$2.48 (-6.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.58B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.69
Change-$2.65 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.58B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (1.24) vs FWAFX (0.33). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. FWAFX (6.43). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. FWAFX (8.53).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.45 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.515 | 1.630 | 277% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.24 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 13.29 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.33 | 42.76 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.53 | 18.14 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.70 | 131.36 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers