Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$72.77
Change+$0.21 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.52B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (3.53B). FWAFX (0.48) and RNPEX (0.46) have matching dividends . FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. FWAFX (-1.91). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 24.37 vs. FWAFX (13.88).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.405 | 19.127 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 11.46 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.96 | 43.85 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 24.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.52 | 91.31 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement