Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPEX
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.09
Change+$0.36 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$73.30
Change+$0.79 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
FWAFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). FWAFX (0.49) and RNPEX (0.46) have matching dividends . FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.66 vs. FWAFX (-1.08). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. FWAFX (16.17).
| FWAFX | RNPEX | FWAFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.644 | 19.044 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | 12.66 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.29 | 61.27 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.17 | 34.72 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.20 | 97.52 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement