Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$38.83
Change-$1.05 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.59
Change-$1.15 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. FWAFX (3.57B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.48) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. FWAFX (0.20). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.64 vs. FWAFX (18.43).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.843 | 20.449 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 165B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.20 | 13.49 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.60 | 47.67 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 28.64 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.35 | 91.17 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers