Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs NPFCX
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.09
Change+$0.36 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$69.28
Change+$0.74 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
FWAFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). FWAFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWAFX (0.49) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWAFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWAFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWAFX (0.98). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWAFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. FWAFX (-1.08). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.75 vs. FWAFX (16.17).
| FWAFX | NPFCX | FWAFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.48 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.644 | 18.377 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | 11.61 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.29 | 58.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.17 | 29.75 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.20 | 88.45 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers