Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVSKX vs JVMCX
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVSKX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies K
Price$56.82
Change+$0.64 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.25B
FVSKX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVSKX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVSKX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. FVSKX (1.74B). FVSKX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVSKX (0.32) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVSKX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVSKX (17 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FVSKX (0.72). FVSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVSKX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.54 vs. FVSKX (-7.35). FVSKX return over 5 years is better than : 80.11 vs. JVMCX (54.71).
| FVSKX | JVMCX | FVSKX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.85 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.86 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.350 | 10.909 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 24.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.35 | -2.54 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.52 | 30.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.11 | 54.71 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.78 | 50.96 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement