Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVRLX vs NLSAX
FVRLX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts FVRLX vs NLSAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.22
Change+$0.08 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
FVRLX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVRLX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVRLX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. FVRLX (4.51M). FVRLX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: FVRLX (2.00) vs NLSAX (0.00). FVRLX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: FVRLX (15 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FVRLX (1.52). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FVRLX (7.13). FVRLX (1000) and NLSAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FVRLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.36 vs. NLSAX (8.16). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.51 vs. FVRLX (-37.99).
| FVRLX | NLSAX | FVRLX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.68 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.68 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.852 | 4.117 | 409% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.51M | 7.45B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.36 | 8.16 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.57 | 18.11 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.99 | 27.51 | -138% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.74 | 46.89 | -89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement