Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVLZX vs JVMCX
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVLZX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
Price$36.65
Change+$0.28 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.13M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVLZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVLZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. FVLZX (336M). FVLZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVLZX (0.95) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVLZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVLZX (8 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FVLZX (0.80). FVLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVLZX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. FVLZX (-2.79). FVLZX return over 5 years is better than : 96.46 vs. JVMCX (50.96).
| FVLZX | JVMCX | FVLZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.87 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.88 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.475 | 8.696 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336M | 23.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.79 | -0.47 | 594% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 17.84 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.46 | 50.96 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement