Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVLZX vs JVMCX
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVLZX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
Price$38.76
Change+$1.49 (+4.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.48M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVLZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVLZX is a StrongBuy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. FVLZX (352M). FVLZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVLZX (1.25) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVLZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVLZX (9 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FVLZX (0.68). FVLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVLZX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). FVLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.86 vs. JVMCX (3.34). FVLZX return over 5 years is better than : 47.03 vs. JVMCX (15.97).
| FVLZX | JVMCX | FVLZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.85 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.86 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.072 | 5.121 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 24.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.86 | 3.34 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.51 | 6.94 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.03 | 15.97 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers