Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVLZX vs JVMCX
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FVLZX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
Price$37.60
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.26M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.3B
FVLZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVLZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVLZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FVLZX (341M). FVLZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FVLZX (0.90) vs JVMCX (0.00). FVLZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FVLZX (9 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FVLZX (0.80). FVLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FVLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FVLZX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. FVLZX (-0.66). FVLZX return over 5 years is better than : 89.37 vs. JVMCX (48.03).
| FVLZX | JVMCX | FVLZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.184 | 11.265 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341M | 24.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.66 | 1.22 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.88 | 21.25 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.37 | 48.03 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers