Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVD vs SPLV
FVD vs SPLV Comparison
Open Charts FVD vs SPLV
First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF
Price$46.31
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$451.74K
Net Assets9.14B
Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF
Price$73.37
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Volume$2.98M
Net Assets7.88B
FVD vs SPLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVD vs. SPLV commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVD is a StrongBuy and SPLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FVD has more net assets: 9.15B vs. SPLV (7.88B). FVD has a higher annual dividend yield than SPLV: FVD (7.360) vs SPLV (6.156). FVD was incepted earlier than SPLV: FVD (22 years) vs SPLV (14 years). SPLV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FVD (0.60). FVD has a higher turnover SPLV (68.00) vs SPLV (68.00).
| FVD | SPLV | FVD / SPLV | |
| Gain YTD | 7.360 | 6.156 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 9.15B | 7.88B | 116% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.25 | 240% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 68.00 | 107% |
| Yield | 2.20 | 1.82 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FVD | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FVD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVD has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FVD jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FVD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVD | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| GGG - FVD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| NDSN - FVD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| LIN - FVD | 74% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| DCI - FVD | 72% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| TROW - FVD | 72% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
More | ||||
SPLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPLV has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPLV jumps, then L could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPLV | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| L - SPLV | 83% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ADP - SPLV | 78% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| PNW - SPLV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| LIN - SPLV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| UDR - SPLV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||