FVCB
Price
$15.74
Change
+$0.14 (+0.90%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
279.51M
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCBS
Price
$29.82
Change
+$0.31 (+1.05%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
851.57M
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FVCB vs MCBS

Header iconFVCB vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts FVCB vs MCBSBanner chart's image
FVCBank
Price$15.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.90%)
Volume$200
Capitalization279.51M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$29.82
Change+$0.31 (+1.05%)
Volume$200
Capitalization851.57M
FVCB vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
FVCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FVCB vs. MCBS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVCB is a Buy and MCBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FVCB: $15.60 vs. MCBS: $29.51)
Brand notoriety: FVCB and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FVCB: 101% vs. MCBS: 163%
Market capitalization -- FVCB: $279.51M vs. MCBS: $851.57M
FVCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $279.51M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $851.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FVCB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than FVCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FVCB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FVCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than FVCB.

Price Growth

FVCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.56% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($852M) has a higher market cap than FVCB($280M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than MCBS: FVCB (12.89) vs MCBS (11.19). FVCB YTD gains are higher at: 12.603 vs. MCBS (11.191). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. FVCB (14.9M). FVCB has less debt than MCBS: FVCB (25.6M) vs MCBS (433M). MCBS has higher revenues than FVCB: MCBS (146M) vs FVCB (64M).
FVCBMCBSFVCB / MCBS
Capitalization280M852M33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.60311.191113%
P/E Ratio12.8911.19115%
Revenue64M146M44%
Total Cash14.9M279M5%
Total Debt25.6M433M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FVCB vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FVCB
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7239
SMR RATING
1..100
5333
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6562
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCBS's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as FVCB (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FVCB (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FVCB (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (49) in the null industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FVCB (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FVCBMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FVCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKVBX18.040.09
+0.50%
MFS International Large Cap Value A
FSQZX12.38N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq Z
JGIRX92.74-1.31
-1.39%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R5
FNGRX16.97-0.31
-1.79%
Franklin Intl Growth R
BGFIX10.54-0.24
-2.23%
William Blair Growth I

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been closely correlated with AX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then AX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+0.58%
AX - FVCB
67%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
MCBS - FVCB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
PEBO - FVCB
67%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
PCB - FVCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
HBCP - FVCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+0.85%
SMBC - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
SBSI - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
AROW - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
UBSI - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
HBT - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
More