Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVADX vs SSGSX
FVADX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FVADX vs SSGSX
Franklin Small Cap Value Adv
Price$62.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.85B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.78
Change+$0.17 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
FVADX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVADX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVADX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. FVADX (3.85B). FVADX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FVADX (1.02) vs SSGSX (0.50). FVADX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FVADX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FVADX (0.73). FVADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.68 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FVADX: SSGSX (2500) vs FVADX (100000). FVADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.19 vs. SSGSX (-5.37). FVADX return over 5 years is better than : 41.17 vs. SSGSX (18.02).
| FVADX | SSGSX | FVADX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.26 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.26 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.014 | -1.766 | -171% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.85B | 5.5B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.50 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.19 | -5.37 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | -8.25 | -154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.17 | 18.02 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.94 | 19.99 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement