FUTU
Price
$159.78
Change
-$14.22 (-8.17%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.26B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAKA
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.62 (-65.96%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
215.95M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUTU vs NAKA

Header iconFUTU vs NAKA Comparison
Open Charts FUTU vs NAKABanner chart's image
Futu Holdings
Price$159.78
Change-$14.22 (-8.17%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization22.26B
Nakamoto
Price$0.32
Change-$0.62 (-65.96%)
Volume$4.67M
Capitalization215.95M
FUTU vs NAKA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUTU vs. NAKA commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUTU is a Buy and NAKA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FUTU: $159.78 vs. NAKA: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: FUTU and NAKA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUTU: 127% vs. NAKA: 50%
Market capitalization -- FUTU: $22.26B vs. NAKA: $215.95M
FUTU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $22.26B. NAKA’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $215.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAKA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NAKA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUTU is a better buy in the long-term than NAKA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUTU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAKA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUTU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NAKA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAKA is a better buy in the short-term than FUTU.

Price Growth

FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while NAKA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -17.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUTU is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

NAKA is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUTU($22.3B) has a higher market cap than NAKA($216M). FUTU YTD gains are higher at: -2.698 vs. NAKA (-8.602). FUTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. NAKA (-89.61M). FUTU has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. NAKA (24.2M). NAKA has less debt than FUTU: NAKA (204M) vs FUTU (13.6B). FUTU has higher revenues than NAKA: FUTU (20.8B) vs NAKA (1.98M).
FUTUNAKAFUTU / NAKA
Capitalization22.3B216M10,324%
EBITDA12.2B-89.61M-13,615%
Gain YTD-2.698-8.60231%
P/E Ratio17.94N/A-
Revenue20.8B1.98M1,050,505%
Total Cash15.9B24.2M65,702%
Total Debt13.6B204M6,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUTU: Fundamental Ratings
FUTU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUTUNAKA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUTU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAKA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUUNF0.130.02
+14.25%
Azarga Metals Corporation
SMTOY47.822.98
+6.65%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
PIGEF12.42N/A
N/A
Pigeon Corp.
DPNEY0.88N/A
N/A
Daphne International Holdings Ltd.
CNVVY12.19-0.40
-3.18%
ConvaTec Group plc

FUTU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUTU has been closely correlated with TIGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUTU jumps, then TIGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUTU
1D Price
Change %
FUTU100%
-1.20%
TIGR - FUTU
71%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
HKXCY - FUTU
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
HOOD - FUTU
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
HUT - FUTU
41%
Loosely correlated
+5.06%
CLSK - FUTU
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
More

NAKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAKA has been loosely correlated with ABTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAKA jumps, then ABTC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAKA
1D Price
Change %
NAKA100%
-10.11%
ABTC - NAKA
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.59%
FUTU - NAKA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
CCM - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBKR - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
SRTA - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
More