FUSB
Price
$12.01
Change
-$0.13 (-1.07%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
69.17M
WDFN
Price
$21.75
Change
-$1.25 (-5.43%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
30.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUSB vs WDFN

Header iconFUSB vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts FUSB vs WDFNBanner chart's image
First US Bancshares
Price$12.01
Change-$0.13 (-1.07%)
Volume$12.89K
Capitalization69.17M
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$21.75
Change-$1.25 (-5.43%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization30.38M
FUSB vs WDFN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUSB vs. WDFN commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUSB is a Hold and WDFN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FUSB: $12.01 vs. WDFN: $21.75)
Brand notoriety: FUSB and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUSB: 460% vs. WDFN: 236%
Market capitalization -- FUSB: $69.17M vs. WDFN: $30.38M
FUSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $69.17M. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $30.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUSB is a better buy in the long-term than WDFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUSB’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUSB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUSB is a better buy in the short-term than WDFN.

Price Growth

FUSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUSB($69.2M) has a higher market cap than WDFN($30.4M). FUSB has higher P/E ratio than WDFN: FUSB (12.38) vs WDFN (7.16). WDFN YTD gains are higher at: 13.129 vs. FUSB (-3.583). WDFN has more cash in the bank: 12.1M vs. FUSB (10.5M). WDFN has less debt than FUSB: WDFN (19M) vs FUSB (30.9M).
FUSBWDFNFUSB / WDFN
Capitalization69.2M30.4M228%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.58313.129-27%
P/E Ratio12.387.16173%
Revenue39.9MN/A-
Total Cash10.5M12.1M87%
Total Debt30.9M19M163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUSB vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
FUSB
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3784
SMR RATING
1..100
7057
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDFN's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FUSB (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFN (84) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FUSB (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FUSB (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDFN (84) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew significantly faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUSBWDFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAWHY12.240.26
+2.17%
Man Wah Holdings, Ltd.
AMROF0.26N/A
N/A
AMAERO LTD.
RYKKF23.75N/A
N/A
Ryohin Keikaku Co. Ltd.
HLRD411.00N/A
N/A
Hilliard Corp.
GWBK0.09N/A
N/A
Gateway Bank, F.S.B. (Oakland, CA)

FUSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUSB and AFBI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUSB and AFBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUSB
1D Price
Change %
FUSB100%
-1.07%
AFBI - FUSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
NSTS - FUSB
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
HFBL - FUSB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGYR - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
KFFB - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
More

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and BANC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and BANC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
N/A
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
KFFB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
USMT - WDFN
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
VABK - WDFN
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More