FUSB
Price
$15.03
Change
-$0.90 (-5.65%)
Updated
Feb 4, 01:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDFN
Price
$25.75
Change
+$0.70 (+2.79%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
41.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUSB vs WDFN

Header iconFUSB vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts FUSB vs WDFNBanner chart's image
First US Bancshares
Price$15.03
Change-$0.90 (-5.65%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization90.8M
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$25.75
Change+$0.70 (+2.79%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization41.7M
FUSB vs WDFN Comparison Chart in %
FUSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUSB vs. WDFN commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUSB is a StrongBuy and WDFN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FUSB: $15.93 vs. WDFN: $29.80)
Brand notoriety: FUSB and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUSB: 7% vs. WDFN: 40%
Market capitalization -- FUSB: $90.8M vs. WDFN: $41.7M
FUSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $90.8M. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUSB is a better buy in the long-term than WDFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDFN is a better buy in the short-term than FUSB.

Price Growth

FUSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.94% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUSB($90.8M) has a higher market cap than WDFN($41.7M). FUSB has higher P/E ratio than WDFN: FUSB (15.93) vs WDFN (8.92). FUSB YTD gains are higher at: 14.030 vs. WDFN (9.852). FUSB (10.7M) and WDFN (10.4M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . WDFN has less debt than FUSB: WDFN (14M) vs FUSB (20.9M). FUSB has higher revenues than WDFN: FUSB (40.3M) vs WDFN (22.3M).
FUSBWDFNFUSB / WDFN
Capitalization90.8M41.7M218%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.0309.852142%
P/E Ratio15.938.92178%
Revenue40.3M22.3M181%
Total Cash10.7M10.4M103%
Total Debt20.9M14M149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUSB vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
FUSB
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1695
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3663
SMR RATING
1..100
7257
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1262
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDFN's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUSB (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (63) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FUSB (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (44) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFN (62) in the null industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUSBWDFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CISCF0.02N/A
N/A
CISCOM CORP.
NPEGF41.17N/A
N/A
Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.
SINGF4.96N/A
N/A
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
VDEVF35.66N/A
N/A
Van de Velde NV
WHWRF0.05N/A
N/A
World Houseware

FUSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUSB has been loosely correlated with TECTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUSB jumps, then TECTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUSB
1D Price
Change %
FUSB100%
-0.06%
TECTP - FUSB
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
IROQ - FUSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
BPOPM - FUSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
ECBK - FUSB
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
FCNCA - FUSB
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and PRMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and PRMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
N/A
PRMY - WDFN
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
KNFSF - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DB - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More