FUSB
Price
$12.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
53.59M
MGYR
Price
$16.74
Change
+$0.17 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
73.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUSB vs MGYR

Header iconFUSB vs MGYR Comparison
Open Charts FUSB vs MGYRBanner chart's image
First US Bancshares
Price$12.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.82K
Capitalization53.59M
Magyar Ban
Price$16.74
Change+$0.17 (+1.03%)
Volume$3.08K
Capitalization73.86M
FUSB vs MGYR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGYR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUSB vs. MGYR commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUSB is a Buy and MGYR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FUSB: $12.99 vs. MGYR: $16.74)
Brand notoriety: FUSB and MGYR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUSB: 295% vs. MGYR: 41%
Market capitalization -- FUSB: $53.59M vs. MGYR: $73.86M
FUSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.59M. MGYR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $73.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGYR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGYR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUSB is a better buy in the long-term than MGYR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGYR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGYR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUSB is a better buy in the short-term than MGYR.

Price Growth

FUSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while MGYR (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGYR($73.9M) has a higher market cap than FUSB($53.6M). MGYR has higher P/E ratio than FUSB: MGYR (61.67) vs FUSB (6.65). MGYR YTD gains are higher at: 15.601 vs. FUSB (4.284). FUSB has more cash in the bank: 10.3M vs. MGYR (3.13M). FUSB has less debt than MGYR: FUSB (20.8M) vs MGYR (28.8M). FUSB has higher revenues than MGYR: FUSB (40.7M) vs MGYR (30.7M).
FUSBMGYRFUSB / MGYR
Capitalization53.6M73.9M73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.28415.60127%
P/E Ratio6.6561.6711%
Revenue40.7M30.7M133%
Total Cash10.3M3.13M329%
Total Debt20.8M28.8M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUSB vs MGYR: Fundamental Ratings
FUSB
MGYR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4148
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3724
SMR RATING
1..100
5457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUSB's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MGYR (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to MGYR’s over the last 12 months.

MGYR's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUSB (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's SMR Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MGYR (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to MGYR’s over the last 12 months.

MGYR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUSB (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.

FUSB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGYR (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew significantly faster than MGYR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUSBMGYR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGYR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HKTTF1.48N/A
N/A
Hkt Trust and Hkt Ltd
TSDRF0.07N/A
N/A
Tsodilo Resources Limited
YIPCF0.17N/A
N/A
Yip's Chemical Holdings Ltd.
NMPWP54.15N/A
N/A
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
CHRHF1.75N/A
N/A
CHERVON HLDGS LTD.

FUSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUSB and AFBI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUSB and AFBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUSB
1D Price
Change %
FUSB100%
N/A
AFBI - FUSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
NSTS - FUSB
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
HFBL - FUSB
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
KFFB - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
MGYR - FUSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More

MGYR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGYR and BFIN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGYR and BFIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGYR
1D Price
Change %
MGYR100%
+1.03%
BFIN - MGYR
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
FNWD - MGYR
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
HVLM - MGYR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLFY - MGYR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CFBK - MGYR
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More