FURCF
Price
$10.58
Change
+$1.25 (+13.40%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.96B
NKRKF
Price
$6.96
Change
-$0.25 (-3.47%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FURCF vs NKRKF

Header iconFURCF vs NKRKF Comparison
Open Charts FURCF vs NKRKFBanner chart's image
FORVIA SE
Price$10.58
Change+$1.25 (+13.40%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization4.96B
Nokian Tyres
Price$6.96
Change-$0.25 (-3.47%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization1.29B
FURCF vs NKRKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FURCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NKRKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FURCF vs. NKRKF commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FURCF is a Buy and NKRKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FURCF: $10.58 vs. NKRKF: $6.95)
Brand notoriety: FURCF and NKRKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FURCF: 915% vs. NKRKF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FURCF: $4.96B vs. NKRKF: $1.29B
FURCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $4.96B. NKRKF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FURCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNKRKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FURCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NKRKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FURCF and NKRKF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FURCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NKRKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FURCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NKRKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NKRKF is a better buy in the short-term than FURCF.

Price Growth

FURCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +13.37% price change this week, while NKRKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.39% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FURCF($4.96B) has a higher market cap than NKRKF($1.29B). FURCF has higher P/E ratio than NKRKF: FURCF (153.85) vs NKRKF (7.13). FURCF YTD gains are higher at: 20.811 vs. NKRKF (-9.144). FURCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.32B vs. NKRKF (-24M). FURCF has more cash in the bank: 3.52B vs. NKRKF (357M). NKRKF has less debt than FURCF: NKRKF (404M) vs FURCF (11.5B). FURCF has higher revenues than NKRKF: FURCF (27.8B) vs NKRKF (1.69B).
FURCFNKRKFFURCF / NKRKF
Capitalization4.96B1.29B384%
EBITDA2.32B-24M-9,679%
Gain YTD20.811-9.144-228%
P/E Ratio153.857.132,157%
Revenue27.8B1.69B1,645%
Total Cash3.52B357M987%
Total Debt11.5B404M2,847%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FURCF vs NKRKF: Fundamental Ratings
FURCF
NKRKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4149
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4376
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FURCF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NKRKF (7). This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

FURCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NKRKF (100). This means that FURCF’s stock grew similarly to NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

NKRKF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FURCF (98). This means that NKRKF’s stock grew similarly to FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

FURCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKRKF (76). This means that FURCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKRKF’s over the last 12 months.

NKRKF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FURCF (92). This means that NKRKF’s stock grew significantly faster than FURCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FURCFNKRKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FURCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NKRKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TADAX30.340.34
+1.13%
Transamerica US Growth A
TRLGX89.010.84
+0.95%
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr I
GTCAX24.720.21
+0.86%
Gabelli Global Content & Connect A
EIISX16.800.10
+0.60%
Parametric International Equity I
CSUZX23.810.06
+0.25%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z

FURCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FURCF has been loosely correlated with PASTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FURCF jumps, then PASTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FURCF
1D Price
Change %
FURCF100%
N/A
PASTF - FURCF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLEEY - FURCF
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.75%
CTTAY - FURCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
MNTHY - FURCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
MGDDY - FURCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
More

NKRKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKRKF and ASEKF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKRKF and ASEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKRKF
1D Price
Change %
NKRKF100%
N/A
ASEKF - NKRKF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOXF - NKRKF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
FURCF - NKRKF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PASTF - NKRKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLLY - NKRKF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
More