Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FUND vs IWS
FUND vs IWS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUND vs. IWS commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUND is a Hold and IWS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWS has more net assets: 13.8B vs. FUND (277M). FUND has a higher annual dividend yield than IWS: FUND (20.305) vs IWS (8.031). FUND was incepted earlier than IWS: FUND (38 years) vs IWS (24 years). IWS (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FUND (1.12). IWS has a higher turnover FUND (16.00) vs FUND (16.00).
| FUND | IWS | FUND / IWS | |
| Gain YTD | 20.305 | 8.031 | 253% |
| Net Assets | 277M | 13.8B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.23 | 487% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 19.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.51 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FUND | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSMR | 21.65 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March | |||
| FHLC | 73.08 | -0.19 | -0.26% |
| Fidelity MSCI Health Care ETF | |||
| ECNS | 36.34 | -0.28 | -0.76% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
| DDLS | 41.48 | -0.38 | -0.91% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF | |||
| QQQS | 32.53 | -1.17 | -3.47% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | |||
FUND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUND has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUND jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUND | 100% | -1.24% | ||
| APAM - FUND | 69% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| NUE - FUND | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| STLD - FUND | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| RS - FUND | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| HP - FUND | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||