FUNC
Price
$38.12
Change
+$0.23 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
247.57M
30 days until earnings call
LWCL
Price
$39.30
Change
-$0.70 (-1.75%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
41.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs LWCL

Header iconFUNC vs LWCL Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs LWCLBanner chart's image
First United
Price$38.12
Change+$0.23 (+0.61%)
Volume$78.43K
Capitalization247.57M
Lewis & Clark BAN
Price$39.30
Change-$0.70 (-1.75%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization41.75M
FUNC vs LWCL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LWCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. LWCL commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a StrongBuy and LWCL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $38.12 vs. LWCL: $39.30)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and LWCL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 361% vs. LWCL: 50%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $247.57M vs. LWCL: $41.75M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $247.57M. LWCL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLWCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LWCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than LWCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LWCL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LWCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LWCL is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while LWCL (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($248M) has a higher market cap than LWCL($41.8M). LWCL has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: LWCL (786.00) vs FUNC (10.44). LWCL YTD gains are higher at: 30.782 vs. FUNC (15.480).
FUNCLWCLFUNC / LWCL
Capitalization248M41.8M593%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.48030.78250%
P/E Ratio10.44786.001%
Revenue83.7MN/A-
Total Cash82.8MN/A-
Total Debt151MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs LWCL: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
LWCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7235
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
44100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
751
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LWCL (99) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWCL (100) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew significantly faster than LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LWCL (100) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LWCL (46) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

LWCL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUNC (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LWCL’s stock grew significantly faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCLWCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LWCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGGHY14.50N/A
N/A
IG Group Holdings Plc.
KLIB140.00N/A
N/A
Killbuck Bancshares Inc.
SIGY3.75N/A
N/A
Sigyn Therapeutics Inc.
CNSRF13.40N/A
N/A
Coinshares International Limited
AMKBY10.00-0.04
-0.40%
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.61%
SHBI - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
FNB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
CWBC - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
FULT - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

LWCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWCL and CCBC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWCL and CCBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWCL
1D Price
Change %
LWCL100%
-1.75%
CCBC - LWCL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRCY - LWCL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
MPB - LWCL
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
NBN - LWCL
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
FUNC - LWCL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More