FUNC
Price
$34.11
Change
-$0.55 (-1.59%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
92 days until earnings call
KTHN
Price
$25.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
65.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs KTHN

Header iconFUNC vs KTHN Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs KTHNBanner chart's image
First United
Price$34.11
Change-$0.55 (-1.59%)
Volume$28.04K
Capitalization152.19M
Katahdin Bankshares
Price$25.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization65.95M
FUNC vs KTHN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. KTHN commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Buy and KTHN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $34.11 vs. KTHN: $25.00)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and KTHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 65% vs. KTHN: 5%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. KTHN: $65.95M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. KTHN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $65.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTHN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KTHN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTHN is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTHN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KTHN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than KTHN.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while KTHN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than KTHN($66M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than KTHN: FUNC (10.14) vs KTHN (6.13). FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 3.332 vs. KTHN (1.715). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. KTHN (7.18M). KTHN has less debt than FUNC: KTHN (109K) vs FUNC (112M). FUNC has higher revenues than KTHN: FUNC (71.3M) vs KTHN (39M).
FUNCKTHNFUNC / KTHN
Capitalization152M66M230%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.3321.715194%
P/E Ratio10.146.13165%
Revenue71.3M39M183%
Total Cash86.9M7.18M1,210%
Total Debt112M109K102,752%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs KTHN: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
KTHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2920
SMR RATING
1..100
3952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTHN's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KTHN (52) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to KTHN’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KTHN (51) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to KTHN’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCKTHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAUFF0.240.02
+8.87%
AIC Mines Ltd.
PPTDF11.950.06
+0.50%
Peptidream, Inc.
BNCDY36.50N/A
N/A
Banca Mediolanum SPA
RSCF0.08N/A
N/A
Reflect Scientific, Inc.
MSBHF20.53-0.19
-0.92%
Mitsubishi Corp.

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-1.59%
HTBK - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
FNB - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
SHBI - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
SSB - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
EFSC - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More

KTHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTHN and FUNC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTHN and FUNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHN
1D Price
Change %
KTHN100%
N/A
FUNC - KTHN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
EFSC - KTHN
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
BHRB - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
QNBC - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
NBTB - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More