FUNC
Price
$36.26
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
234.93M
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KTHN
Price
$26.50
Change
-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
84.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs KTHN

Header iconFUNC vs KTHN Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs KTHNBanner chart's image
First United
Price$36.26
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$100
Capitalization234.93M
Katahdin Bankshares
Price$26.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$300
Capitalization84.31M
FUNC vs KTHN Comparison Chart in %
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KTHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. KTHN commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a StrongBuy and KTHN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $36.25 vs. KTHN: $26.50)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and KTHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 51% vs. KTHN: 45%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $234.93M vs. KTHN: $84.31M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $234.93M. KTHN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKTHN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KTHN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTHN is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTHN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KTHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than KTHN.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.57% price change this week, while KTHN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($235M) has a higher market cap than KTHN($84.3M). KTHN (9.78) and FUNC (9.42) have similar P/E ratio . FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 10.659 vs. KTHN (8.665). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 77.3M vs. KTHN (9.02M). KTHN has less debt than FUNC: KTHN (30M) vs FUNC (151M). FUNC has higher revenues than KTHN: FUNC (83.7M) vs KTHN (38.9M).
FUNCKTHNFUNC / KTHN
Capitalization235M84.3M279%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.6598.665123%
P/E Ratio9.429.7896%
Revenue83.7M38.9M215%
Total Cash77.3M9.02M857%
Total Debt151M30M503%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs KTHN: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
KTHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
989
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2920
SMR RATING
1..100
4457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTHN's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KTHN (57) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to KTHN’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KTHN (50) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to KTHN’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCKTHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KTHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGRDY31.020.59
+1.94%
LeGrand SA
PKPYY8.50N/A
N/A
Pick n' Pay Stores Ltd.
RGLXY3.23N/A
N/A
RTL Group SA
CSTAF11.52N/A
N/A
Constellation Acquisition Corp I
NRVTF0.10N/A
-0.51%
NORAM LITHIUM CORP

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.11%
SHBI - FUNC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
OSBC - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
WBS - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
CCNE - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
CWBC - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More

KTHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTHN and FUNC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTHN and FUNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHN
1D Price
Change %
KTHN100%
-0.19%
FUNC - KTHN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
EFSC - KTHN
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BHRB - KTHN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
QNBC - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
NBTB - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More