FULT
Price
$21.93
Change
-$0.13 (-0.59%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.97B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WASH
Price
$36.57
Change
+$0.85 (+2.38%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
696.49M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs WASH

Header iconFULT vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs WASHBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$21.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.59%)
Volume$1.74K
Capitalization3.97B
Washington Trust Ban
Price$36.57
Change+$0.85 (+2.38%)
Volume$145.49K
Capitalization696.49M
FULT vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. WASH commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and WASH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $22.06 vs. WASH: $36.57)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 134% vs. WASH: 114%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.97B vs. WASH: $696.49M
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.97B. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $696.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WASH is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.21% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +21.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.97B) has a higher market cap than WASH($696M). WASH has higher P/E ratio than FULT: WASH (13.50) vs FULT (10.61). WASH YTD gains are higher at: 26.147 vs. FULT (14.123). FULT has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. WASH (35.6M). WASH has less debt than FULT: WASH (852M) vs FULT (1.47B). FULT has higher revenues than WASH: FULT (1.3B) vs WASH (119M).
FULTWASHFULT / WASH
Capitalization3.97B696M570%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.12326.14754%
P/E Ratio10.6113.5079%
Revenue1.3B119M1,092%
Total Cash307M35.6M862%
Total Debt1.47B852M173%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3895
SMR RATING
1..100
1266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7243
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (53). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (95). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (66). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (44). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (72). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNGLX21.120.09
+0.43%
Commonwealth Global
WOFDX59.55N/A
N/A
Allspring Opportunity Admin
RSIRX15.50-0.03
-0.19%
Victory RS International R6
MITDX36.96-0.19
-0.51%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R4
MCGFX10.25-0.08
-0.77%
AMG GW&K Small Cap Growth N

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+2.18%
FNB - FULT
94%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
WTFC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ONB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
BY - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
FFBC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
More

WASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WASH has been closely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WASH jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WASH
1D Price
Change %
WASH100%
+2.38%
CAC - WASH
90%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
TRST - WASH
90%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
BY - WASH
89%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
HTBK - WASH
89%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
FULT - WASH
87%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
More