FULT
Price
$19.38
Change
-$0.34 (-1.72%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
45 days until earnings call
UCB
Price
$33.28
Change
-$0.30 (-0.89%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.04B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs UCB

Header iconFULT vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs UCBBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$19.38
Change-$0.34 (-1.72%)
Volume$1.16M
Capitalization3.53B
United Community Banks
Price$33.28
Change-$0.30 (-0.89%)
Volume$440.74K
Capitalization4.04B
FULT vs UCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. UCB commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and UCB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $19.38 vs. UCB: $33.28)
Brand notoriety: FULT and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 68% vs. UCB: 73%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.53B vs. UCB: $4.04B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.53B. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than UCB.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($4.04B) has a higher market cap than FULT($3.53B). UCB has higher P/E ratio than FULT: UCB (15.13) vs FULT (11.40). UCB YTD gains are higher at: 4.760 vs. FULT (2.552). FULT has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. UCB (198M). UCB has less debt than FULT: UCB (155M) vs FULT (1.77B). FULT has higher revenues than UCB: FULT (1.29B) vs UCB (953M).
FULTUCBFULT / UCB
Capitalization3.53B4.04B87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.5524.76054%
P/E Ratio11.4015.1375%
Revenue1.29B953M135%
Total Cash389M198M196%
Total Debt1.77B155M1,145%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
965
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3352
SMR RATING
1..100
1213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (82). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (52). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (13). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (47). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (78). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWFFX90.910.66
+0.73%
American Funds New World F1
DEVCX50.320.05
+0.10%
Macquarie Small Cap Value C
INFCX14.50N/A
N/A
Kotak India Equity Fund Class C
CZMGX20.29N/A
N/A
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
BEGIX22.30-0.22
-0.98%
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-1.72%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
HWC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
TRMK - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
More