FULT
Price
$19.72
Change
+$0.27 (+1.39%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.59B
46 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$99.38
Change
+$1.90 (+1.95%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.71B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs PNFP

Header iconFULT vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs PNFPBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$19.72
Change+$0.27 (+1.39%)
Volume$23.77K
Capitalization3.59B
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$99.38
Change+$1.90 (+1.95%)
Volume$20.48K
Capitalization7.71B
FULT vs PNFP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. PNFP commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and PNFP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $19.45 vs. PNFP: $97.48)
Brand notoriety: FULT and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 60% vs. PNFP: 52%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.59B vs. PNFP: $7.71B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.59B. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than PNFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than PNFP.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.54% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($7.71B) has a higher market cap than FULT($3.59B). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than FULT: PNFP (13.21) vs FULT (11.60). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 2.923 vs. PNFP (-14.186). FULT has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. PNFP (339M). FULT has less debt than PNFP: FULT (1.77B) vs PNFP (2.2B). PNFP has higher revenues than FULT: PNFP (1.68B) vs FULT (1.29B).
FULTPNFPFULT / PNFP
Capitalization3.59B7.71B47%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.923-14.186-21%
P/E Ratio11.6013.2188%
Revenue1.29B1.68B77%
Total Cash389M339M115%
Total Debt1.77B2.2B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3146
SMR RATING
1..100
1211
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (61). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (46). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (12). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (55). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (87). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOOL12.310.04
+0.36%
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
FIGB43.260.14
+0.33%
Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF
YFFI10.120.03
+0.30%
Indexperts Yield Focused Fxd Inc ETF
QBUL25.600.02
+0.07%
TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF
DIVB51.57-0.21
-0.41%
iShares Core Dividend ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.05%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
HWC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
TRMK - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+0.01%
SNV - PNFP
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FNB - PNFP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
WTFC - PNFP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
ONB - PNFP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
FULT - PNFP
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More