FULT
Price
$18.60
Change
-$0.11 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
85 days until earnings call
OFG
Price
$43.19
Change
-$0.12 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jul 28, 10:34 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.74B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs OFG

Header iconFULT vs OFG Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs OFGBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$18.60
Change-$0.11 (-0.59%)
Volume$1.4M
Capitalization2.57B
OFG Ban
Price$43.19
Change-$0.12 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization1.74B
FULT vs OFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. OFG commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and OFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $18.60 vs. OFG: $43.31)
Brand notoriety: FULT and OFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 92% vs. OFG: 92%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $2.57B vs. OFG: $1.74B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.57B. OFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than OFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OFG is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.20% price change this week, while OFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

OFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than OFG($1.74B). FULT (9.54) and OFG (9.37) have similar P/E ratio . OFG YTD gains are higher at: 3.831 vs. FULT (-1.575). OFG has more cash in the bank: 744M vs. FULT (304M). OFG has less debt than FULT: OFG (225M) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than OFG: FULT (1.08B) vs OFG (640M).
FULTOFGFULT / OFG
Capitalization2.57B1.74B148%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.5753.831-41%
P/E Ratio9.549.37102%
Revenue1.08B640M169%
Total Cash304M744M41%
Total Debt1.64B225M727%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs OFG: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
OFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5021
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3310
SMR RATING
1..100
1012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OFG (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than OFG’s over the last 12 months.

OFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OFG’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OFG (12) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to OFG’s over the last 12 months.

OFG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OFG’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OFG (68) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to OFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJSIX14.420.10
+0.70%
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity I
SZCIX52.800.05
+0.09%
DWS Small Cap Core Inst
TIRHX18.21-0.01
-0.05%
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel I
ARDEX6.24-0.01
-0.16%
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value N
GQGPX17.07-0.06
-0.35%
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Inv

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.59%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
HWC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
ABCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
TRMK - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
WSFS - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More

OFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OFG has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OFG jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFG
1D Price
Change %
OFG100%
+0.93%
HWC - OFG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
ABCB - OFG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FBP - OFG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
WSFS - OFG
84%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
FULT - OFG
84%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
More