FULT
Price
$17.16
Change
-$0.33 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
37 days until earnings call
MBIN
Price
$31.27
Change
-$1.15 (-3.55%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs MBIN

Header iconFULT vs MBIN Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs MBINBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$17.16
Change-$0.33 (-1.89%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization2.57B
Merchants Ban
Price$31.27
Change-$1.15 (-3.55%)
Volume$147.99K
Capitalization1.87B
FULT vs MBIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. MBIN commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and MBIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $17.16 vs. MBIN: $31.27)
Brand notoriety: FULT and MBIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 109% vs. MBIN: 93%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $2.57B vs. MBIN: $1.87B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.57B. MBIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than MBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MBIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBIN is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while MBIN (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

MBIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than MBIN($1.87B). FULT has higher P/E ratio than MBIN: FULT (9.54) vs MBIN (7.50). FULT YTD gains are higher at: -10.101 vs. MBIN (-13.758). FULT has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. MBIN (10.6M). MBIN has less debt than FULT: MBIN (964M) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than MBIN: FULT (1.08B) vs MBIN (559M).
FULTMBINFULT / MBIN
Capitalization2.57B1.87B138%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.101-13.75873%
P/E Ratio9.547.50127%
Revenue1.08B559M194%
Total Cash304M10.6M2,868%
Total Debt1.64B964M170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs MBIN: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
MBIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3641
SMR RATING
1..100
1112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6181
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5064
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBIN's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (48). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (41). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (12). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (81). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBIN (64). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to MBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTMBIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNI6.66N/A
N/A
PIMCO NEW YORK Municipal Income FUND II
KAUG24.50-0.19
-0.76%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Aug
NDMO10.08-0.13
-1.25%
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
BINV35.82-0.53
-1.46%
Brandes International ETF
QTEC201.53-3.47
-1.69%
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Tech Sector ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-1.89%
HWC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
FNB - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
TRMK - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
UBSI - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
FFBC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More

MBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIN has been loosely correlated with RNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBIN jumps, then RNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBIN
1D Price
Change %
MBIN100%
-3.25%
RNST - MBIN
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
BY - MBIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
ABCB - MBIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
HWC - MBIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
FULT - MBIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More