FULT
Price
$19.45
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.54B
47 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$62.35
Change
+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.29B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs HWC

Header iconFULT vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs HWCBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$19.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization3.54B
Hancock Whitney
Price$62.35
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$436.18K
Capitalization5.29B
FULT vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. HWC commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $19.45 vs. HWC: $62.35)
Brand notoriety: FULT and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 60% vs. HWC: 58%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.54B vs. HWC: $5.29B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.54B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.29B) has a higher market cap than FULT($3.54B). HWC (11.51) and FULT (11.44) have similar P/E ratio . HWC YTD gains are higher at: 15.856 vs. FULT (2.923). HWC has more cash in the bank: 510M vs. FULT (389M). HWC has less debt than FULT: HWC (849M) vs FULT (1.77B). HWC has higher revenues than FULT: HWC (1.47B) vs FULT (1.29B).
FULTHWCFULT / HWC
Capitalization3.54B5.29B67%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.92315.85618%
P/E Ratio11.4411.5199%
Revenue1.29B1.47B88%
Total Cash389M510M76%
Total Debt1.77B849M209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3120
SMR RATING
1..100
1212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4960
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5034

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (38). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (31). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (12). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (48). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (60). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXLIX14.030.08
+0.57%
Impax Large Cap Fund Institutional
SGRNX50.350.13
+0.26%
Allspring Growth Inst
ETIEX13.73-0.02
-0.15%
Eventide Exponential Technologies I
GSFTX35.94-0.07
-0.19%
Columbia Dividend Income Inst
LRSTX20.96-0.06
-0.29%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R5

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.05%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
HWC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
TRMK - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+0.14%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
UCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
ONB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
FULT - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More