FULT
Price
$19.43
Change
+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.54B
43 days until earnings call
GBFH
Price
$40.38
Change
+$1.04 (+2.64%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
575.62M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs GBFH

Header iconFULT vs GBFH Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs GBFHBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$19.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Volume$41.32K
Capitalization3.54B
Gbank Financial Holdings
Price$40.38
Change+$1.04 (+2.64%)
Volume$514
Capitalization575.62M
FULT vs GBFH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. GBFH commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and GBFH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $19.38 vs. GBFH: $39.34)
Brand notoriety: FULT and GBFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 68% vs. GBFH: 143%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.54B vs. GBFH: $575.62M
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.54B. GBFH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $575.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBFH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than GBFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBFH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than GBFH.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while GBFH (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

GBFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.54B) has a higher market cap than GBFH($576M). GBFH has higher P/E ratio than FULT: GBFH (31.74) vs FULT (11.43). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 2.552 vs. GBFH (-8.512). GBFH has less debt than FULT: GBFH (32.2M) vs FULT (1.77B).
FULTGBFHFULT / GBFH
Capitalization3.54B576M614%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.552-8.512-30%
P/E Ratio11.4331.7436%
Revenue1.29BN/A-
Total Cash389MN/A-
Total Debt1.77B32.2M5,509%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTGBFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDSCX31.420.52
+1.68%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr I
VRGEX35.670.35
+0.99%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs R6
TSCHX20.340.08
+0.39%
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity I
RSIYX17.440.05
+0.29%
Victory RS Investors Y
FSMDX36.980.08
+0.22%
Fidelity Mid Cap Index

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-1.72%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
HWC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
TRMK - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
More

GBFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBFH has been loosely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBFH jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBFH
1D Price
Change %
GBFH100%
+2.41%
HOMB - GBFH
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
BWFG - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
BCAL - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
FULT - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
EWBC - GBFH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
More