FULT
Price
$18.75
Change
+$0.45 (+2.46%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.39B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FUNC
Price
$38.76
Change
+$0.64 (+1.68%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
251.82M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs FUNC

Header iconFULT vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$18.75
Change+$0.45 (+2.46%)
Volume$1.97M
Capitalization3.39B
First United
Price$38.76
Change+$0.64 (+1.68%)
Volume$17.24K
Capitalization251.82M
FULT vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. FUNC commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and FUNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $18.29 vs. FUNC: $38.01)
Brand notoriety: FULT and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 39% vs. FUNC: 20%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.39B vs. FUNC: $251.82M
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.39B. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $251.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than FULT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.39B) has a higher market cap than FUNC($252M). FUNC (10.09) and FULT (9.82) have similar P/E ratio . FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 16.031 vs. FULT (-2.271). FULT has more cash in the bank: 362M vs. FUNC (77.3M). FUNC has less debt than FULT: FUNC (151M) vs FULT (1.77B). FULT has higher revenues than FUNC: FULT (1.29B) vs FUNC (83.7M).
FULTFUNCFULT / FUNC
Capitalization3.39B252M1,344%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.27116.031-14%
P/E Ratio9.8210.0997%
Revenue1.29B83.7M1,541%
Total Cash362M77.3M468%
Total Debt1.77B151M1,175%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4026
SMR RATING
1..100
1244
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (36). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (40). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (44). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (57). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (81). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSNVY21.50N/A
N/A
Corbion NV
DBOEY26.19N/A
N/A
Deutsche Boerse AG
DTPKF0.09N/A
N/A
DIRECTA PLUS PLC
GMVHY10.35N/A
N/A
ENTAIN PLC
YUMSF0.95N/A
N/A
Demae Can Co Ltd.

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.54%
FNB - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
ASB - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
FFBC - FULT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
HWC - FULT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
UCB - FULT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with WBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then WBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.16%
WBS - FUNC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
SHBI - FUNC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
CCNE - FUNC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
OSBC - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
FULT - FUNC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
More