FULO
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.01 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.48M
GRPFF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.03 (+7.50%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULO vs GRPFF

Header iconFULO vs GRPFF Comparison
Open Charts FULO vs GRPFFBanner chart's image
FullNet Communications
Price$0.39
Change-$0.01 (-2.50%)
Volume$112
Capitalization5.48M
Grupo Televisa S.A
Price$0.43
Change+$0.03 (+7.50%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization2.94B
FULO vs GRPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULO vs. GRPFF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULO is a Hold and GRPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FULO: $0.39 vs. GRPFF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: FULO and GRPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULO: 1% vs. GRPFF: 151%
Market capitalization -- FULO: $5.48M vs. GRPFF: $2.94B
FULO [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.48M. GRPFF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRPFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FULO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRPFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULO is a better buy in the long-term than GRPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRPFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GRPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FULO and GRPFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FULO (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +9.80% price change this week, while GRPFF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.82% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRPFF($2.94B) has a higher market cap than FULO($5.48M). FULO has higher P/E ratio than GRPFF: FULO (9.35) vs GRPFF (0.40). FULO YTD gains are higher at: 43.955 vs. GRPFF (25.929). FULO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 752K vs. GRPFF (-7.36B). GRPFF has more cash in the bank: 38.9B vs. FULO (2.88M). FULO has less debt than GRPFF: FULO (247K) vs GRPFF (103B). GRPFF has higher revenues than FULO: GRPFF (75.4B) vs FULO (4.2M).
FULOGRPFFFULO / GRPFF
Capitalization5.48M2.94B0%
EBITDA752K-7.36B-0%
Gain YTD43.95525.929170%
P/E Ratio9.350.402,357%
Revenue4.2M75.4B0%
Total Cash2.88M38.9B0%
Total Debt247K103B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULO vs GRPFF: Fundamental Ratings
FULO
GRPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
2093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULO's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRPFF (97). This means that FULO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

FULO's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPFF (100). This means that FULO’s stock grew similarly to GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

FULO's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRPFF (93). This means that FULO’s stock grew significantly faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

FULO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPFF (51). This means that FULO’s stock grew similarly to GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

FULO's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRPFF (98). This means that FULO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULOGRPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TM174.892.88
+1.67%
Toyota Motor Corp
MLNK17.120.28
+1.66%
MeridianLink
RCKT2.900.02
+0.69%
Rocket Pharmaceuticals
NRSN1.910.01
+0.53%
NeuroSense Therapeutics Ltd
LEGN35.64-0.27
-0.75%
Legend Biotech Corp

FULO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FULO and ELMUY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FULO and ELMUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULO
1D Price
Change %
FULO100%
N/A
ELMUY - FULO
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTEGY - FULO
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
FNGR - FULO
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
HKTTF - FULO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTEGF - FULO
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More

GRPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRPFF and FNCTF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRPFF and FNCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRPFF
1D Price
Change %
GRPFF100%
N/A
FNCTF - GRPFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTEGF - GRPFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
HLTOY - GRPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
FULO - GRPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNGR - GRPFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
More