Advertisement
FULC vs MDXG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULC is a Hold and MDXG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FULC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDXG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FULC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MDXG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FULC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDXG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FULC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDXG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FULC (@Biotechnology) experienced а -5.95% price change this week, while MDXG (@Biotechnology) price change was -9.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +268.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
FULC is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
MDXG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+0.76% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| FULC | MDXG | FULC / MDXG | |
| Capitalization | 470M | 973M | 48% |
| EBITDA | -81.28M | 52.7M | -154% |
| Gain YTD | 84.894 | -31.601 | -269% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 31.31 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 364M | - |
| Total Cash | 214M | 119M | 180% |
| Total Debt | 7.57M | 18.5M | 41% |
FULC | MDXG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 3 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FULC's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDXG (77) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that FULC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDXG’s over the last 12 months.
MDXG's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as FULC (92) in the null industry. This means that MDXG’s stock grew similarly to FULC’s over the last 12 months.
MDXG's SMR Rating (51) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULC (97) in the null industry. This means that MDXG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULC’s over the last 12 months.
FULC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MDXG (51) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that FULC’s stock grew similarly to MDXG’s over the last 12 months.
MDXG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for FULC (100) in the null industry. This means that MDXG’s stock grew significantly faster than FULC’s over the last 12 months.
| FULC | MDXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 85% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGRSX | 9.81 | 0.08 | +0.82% |
| Principal Global Real Estate Sec R6 | |||
| SSCPX | 7.48 | 0.06 | +0.81% |
| Saratoga Small Capitalization I | |||
| ATHDX | 31.32 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| American Century Heritage R6 | |||
| DLQAX | 13.97 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity A | |||
| VNSAX | 24.51 | -0.09 | -0.37% |
| Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select A | |||
FULC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULC has been loosely correlated with TRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FULC jumps, then TRDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FULC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FULC | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| TRDA - FULC | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.30% | ||
| BEAM - FULC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| ADPT - FULC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| OCUL - FULC | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| IPSC - FULC | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
MDXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDXG has been loosely correlated with INM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDXG jumps, then INM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDXG | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| INM - MDXG | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| PCVX - MDXG | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| MGNX - MDXG | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| CTMX - MDXG | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| FULC - MDXG | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||