FUL
Price
$62.24
Change
-$0.75 (-1.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
72 days until earnings call
SXT
Price
$107.90
Change
+$2.75 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.93B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs SXT

Header iconFUL vs SXT Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs SXTBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$62.24
Change-$0.75 (-1.19%)
Volume$250.44K
Capitalization4.35B
Sensient Technology
Price$107.90
Change+$2.75 (+2.62%)
Volume$451K
Capitalization2.93B
FUL vs SXT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. SXT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Buy and SXT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $62.24 vs. SXT: $107.90)
Brand notoriety: FUL and SXT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 63% vs. SXT: 121%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. SXT: $2.93B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. SXT’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSXT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUL and SXT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SXT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than SXT.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.40% price change this week, while SXT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +9.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

SXT is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.00% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than SXT($2.93B). SXT has higher P/E ratio than FUL: SXT (31.08) vs FUL (28.70). SXT YTD gains are higher at: 52.904 vs. FUL (-7.025). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. SXT (213M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. SXT (28.9M). SXT has less debt than FUL: SXT (659M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than SXT: FUL (3.51B) vs SXT (1.46B).
FULSXTFUL / SXT
Capitalization4.35B2.93B148%
EBITDA540M213M254%
Gain YTD-7.02552.904-13%
P/E Ratio28.7031.0892%
Revenue3.51B1.46B241%
Total Cash165M28.9M571%
Total Debt1.83B659M278%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs SXT: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
SXT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5933
SMR RATING
1..100
8061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SXT (77) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SXT’s over the last 12 months.

SXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SXT's SMR Rating (61) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SXT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SXT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SXT (53) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULSXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLAIX21.000.15
+0.72%
T. Rowe Price Latin America I
RSLCX68.130.39
+0.58%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
HIINX52.860.03
+0.06%
Harbor International Investor
OAKGX36.63N/A
N/A
Oakmark Global Investor
GGIAX13.31-0.01
-0.08%
Goldman Sachs Global Infras A

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+0.45%
SCL - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
RPM - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KWR - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
AVNT - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
PPG - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More

SXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SXT has been loosely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SXT jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXT
1D Price
Change %
SXT100%
+2.62%
SCL - SXT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
IOSP - SXT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
AVNT - SXT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
FUL - SXT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
KWR - SXT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More