FUL
Price
$53.71
Change
+$1.36 (+2.60%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
66 days until earnings call
PRM
Price
$9.81
Change
-$0.10 (-1.01%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUL vs PRM

Header iconFUL vs PRM Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs PRMBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$53.71
Change+$1.36 (+2.60%)
Volume$606.96K
Capitalization4.35B
Perimeter Solutions
Price$9.81
Change-$0.10 (-1.01%)
Volume$783.15K
Capitalization1.08B
FUL vs PRM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. PRM commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and PRM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $53.71 vs. PRM: $9.81)
Brand notoriety: FUL and PRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 101% vs. PRM: 64%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. PRM: $1.08B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. PRM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than PRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than PRM.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +3.55% price change this week, while PRM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

PRM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.42% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than PRM($1.08B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than PRM: FUL (28.70) vs PRM (18.56). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -20.115 vs. PRM (-23.239). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. PRM (168M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. PRM (52.8M). PRM has less debt than FUL: PRM (690M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than PRM: FUL (3.51B) vs PRM (322M).
FULPRMFUL / PRM
Capitalization4.35B1.08B402%
EBITDA540M168M321%
Gain YTD-20.115-23.23987%
P/E Ratio28.7018.56155%
Revenue3.51B322M1,091%
Total Cash165M52.8M313%
Total Debt1.83B690M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULPRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+2.60%
SCL - FUL
75%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
WLK - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
RPM - FUL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
KWR - FUL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
AVNT - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
More

PRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRM has been loosely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRM jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRM
1D Price
Change %
PRM100%
-1.01%
CBT - PRM
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
WLK - PRM
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
FUL - PRM
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
BCPC - PRM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
MTX - PRM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More