FUL
Price
$61.73
Change
+$5.77 (+10.31%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
81 days until earnings call
MATV
Price
$6.98
Change
+$0.28 (+4.18%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs MATV

Header iconFUL vs MATV Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs MATVBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$61.73
Change+$5.77 (+10.31%)
Volume$1.52M
Capitalization4.35B
Mativ Holdings
Price$6.98
Change+$0.28 (+4.18%)
Volume$2.02M
Capitalization1.01B
FUL vs MATV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. MATV commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Buy and MATV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $61.73 vs. MATV: $6.98)
Brand notoriety: FUL and MATV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 434% vs. MATV: 346%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. MATV: $1.01B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. MATV’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMATV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MATV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than MATV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MATV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MATV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than MATV.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +13.12% price change this week, while MATV (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

MATV is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.60% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than MATV($1.01B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than MATV: FUL (28.70) vs MATV (17.97). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -7.787 vs. MATV (-33.670). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. MATV (-270.9M). FUL has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. MATV (120M). MATV has less debt than FUL: MATV (1.17B) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than MATV: FUL (3.51B) vs MATV (2.03B).
FULMATVFUL / MATV
Capitalization4.35B1.01B431%
EBITDA540M-270.9M-199%
Gain YTD-7.787-33.67023%
P/E Ratio28.7017.97160%
Revenue3.51B2.03B173%
Total Cash165M120M138%
Total Debt1.83B1.17B157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs MATV: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
MATV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
8098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MATV's Valuation (17) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that MATV’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MATV (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MATV’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as MATV (98) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to MATV’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as MATV (62) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to MATV’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as MATV (61) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to MATV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULMATV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAFFX45.330.32
+0.71%
American Funds AMCAP R5
EIERX22.380.13
+0.58%
Eaton Vance Stock I
SPIDX66.320.34
+0.52%
Invesco S&P 500 Index Y
DVLIX30.880.08
+0.26%
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value I
FSLCX18.24N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Stock

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+10.31%
RPM - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
SCL - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
KWR - FUL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
PPG - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
AVNT - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More

MATV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MATV has been loosely correlated with KOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MATV jumps, then KOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MATV
1D Price
Change %
MATV100%
+4.18%
KOP - MATV
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
KWR - MATV
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
EMN - MATV
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
FUL - MATV
55%
Loosely correlated
+10.31%
SCL - MATV
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More