FUL
Price
$62.40
Change
+$1.11 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.31B
12 days until earnings call
IOSP
Price
$85.64
Change
-$0.22 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.13B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs IOSP

Header iconFUL vs IOSP Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs IOSPBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$62.40
Change+$1.11 (+1.81%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization3.31B
Innospec
Price$85.64
Change-$0.22 (-0.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.13B
FUL vs IOSP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. IOSP commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and IOSP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $61.29 vs. IOSP: $85.86)
Brand notoriety: FUL and IOSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 151% vs. IOSP: 67%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $3.31B vs. IOSP: $2.13B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.31B. IOSP’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $221.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIOSP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IOSP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IOSP is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOSP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IOSP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FUL and IOSP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

IOSP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.17% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($3.31B) has a higher market cap than IOSP($2.13B). IOSP has higher P/E ratio than FUL: IOSP (111.51) vs FUL (33.31). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -8.066 vs. IOSP (-21.246). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 477M vs. IOSP (211M). IOSP has more cash in the bank: 267M vs. FUL (96.8M). IOSP has less debt than FUL: IOSP (49.3M) vs FUL (2.11B). FUL has higher revenues than IOSP: FUL (3.53B) vs IOSP (1.79B).
FULIOSPFUL / IOSP
Capitalization3.31B2.13B155%
EBITDA477M211M226%
Gain YTD-8.066-21.24638%
P/E Ratio33.31111.5130%
Revenue3.53B1.79B197%
Total Cash96.8M267M36%
Total Debt2.11B49.3M4,284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs IOSP: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
IOSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
768
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6980
SMR RATING
1..100
8491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
303
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IOSP's Valuation (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (80) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (84) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (91) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (60) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (30) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULIOSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAIX17.370.26
+1.52%
Chase Growth Institutional
DBMAX29.050.33
+1.15%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr A
RGRYX37.200.36
+0.98%
Victory RS Growth Y
BGEVX14.560.13
+0.90%
Baillie Gifford International Growth 5
FMGKX15.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan K

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+3.95%
KWR - FUL
72%
Closely correlated
+4.80%
CBT - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
SCL - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
PPG - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
IOSP - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More

IOSP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOSP has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOSP jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IOSP
1D Price
Change %
IOSP100%
+0.06%
SCL - IOSP
76%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
KWR - IOSP
74%
Closely correlated
+4.80%
MTX - IOSP
71%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
CBT - IOSP
70%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ASIX - IOSP
67%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
More