FUL
Price
$56.18
Change
+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
17 days until earnings call
IOSP
Price
$86.13
Change
+$0.84 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs IOSP

Header iconFUL vs IOSP Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs IOSPBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$56.18
Change+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Volume$215.84K
Capitalization4.35B
Innospec
Price$86.13
Change+$0.84 (+0.98%)
Volume$209.4K
Capitalization3.21B
FUL vs IOSP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. IOSP commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and IOSP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $55.67 vs. IOSP: $85.64)
Brand notoriety: FUL and IOSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 55% vs. IOSP: 75%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. IOSP: $3.21B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. IOSP’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIOSP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IOSP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IOSP is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOSP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IOSP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FUL and IOSP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

IOSP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.54% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUL($4.35B) has a higher market cap than IOSP($3.21B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than IOSP: FUL (28.70) vs IOSP (22.73). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -16.839 vs. IOSP (-21.447). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. IOSP (201M). IOSP has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FUL (165M). IOSP has less debt than FUL: IOSP (45.2M) vs FUL (1.83B). FUL has higher revenues than IOSP: FUL (3.51B) vs IOSP (1.95B).
FULIOSPFUL / IOSP
Capitalization4.35B3.21B136%
EBITDA540M201M269%
Gain YTD-16.839-21.44779%
P/E Ratio28.7022.73126%
Revenue3.51B1.95B180%
Total Cash165M204M81%
Total Debt1.83B45.2M4,051%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs IOSP: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
IOSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5666
SMR RATING
1..100
8086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6180
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (53) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (53) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (66) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IOSP (80) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.

IOSP's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IOSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULIOSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-0.73%
KWR - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
RPM - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
SCL - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
AVNT - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
PPG - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
More

IOSP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOSP has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOSP jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IOSP
1D Price
Change %
IOSP100%
-2.52%
AVNT - IOSP
73%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
SCL - IOSP
73%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
KWR - IOSP
71%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
BCPC - IOSP
68%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
FUL - IOSP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
More