Advertisement
FUJHF vs GWLLF
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUJHF is a Hold and GWLLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUJHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGWLLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUJHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- GWLLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUJHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWLLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUJHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GWLLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FUJHF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while GWLLF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.86%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-0.92% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| FUJHF | GWLLF | FUJHF / GWLLF | |
| Capitalization | 16.2B | 24.5B | 66% |
| EBITDA | 596B | 15.1B | 3,947% |
| Gain YTD | 25.659 | 6.479 | 396% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.38 | 10.51 | 89% |
| Revenue | 4.81T | 201B | 2,391% |
| Total Cash | 2.02T | 44.5B | 4,548% |
| Total Debt | 413B | 57.9B | 713% |
FUJHF | GWLLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUJHF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (32). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
FUJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (95). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
FUJHF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWLLF (54). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
FUJHF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (61). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
FUJHF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (26). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.
| FUJHF | GWLLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBMO | 25.66 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| JULJ | 25.25 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul | |||
| CGCP | 22.71 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | |||
| BENJ | 51.75 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Horizon Landmark ETF | |||
| BUFT | 24.50 | N/A | +0.01% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allctn Dfnsv ETF | |||
FUJHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJHF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJHF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUJHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUJHF | 100% | -2.01% | ||
| HMC - FUJHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| F - FUJHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| TM - FUJHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| GELYF - FUJHF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| GWLLY - FUJHF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GWLLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLF and XPNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLF and XPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWLLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWLLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| XPNGF - GWLLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XPEV - GWLLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| LI - GWLLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| FUJHF - GWLLF | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| GNZUF - GWLLF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||