FUJHF
Price
$22.14
Change
+$0.50 (+2.31%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GNZUF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUJHF vs GNZUF

Header iconFUJHF vs GNZUF Comparison
Open Charts FUJHF vs GNZUFBanner chart's image
Subaru
Price$22.14
Change+$0.50 (+2.31%)
Volume$1.33K
Capitalization15.11B
Guangzhou Automobile Group
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.75B
FUJHF vs GNZUF Comparison Chart in %
FUJHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GNZUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUJHF vs. GNZUF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUJHF is a Hold and GNZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FUJHF: $22.35 vs. GNZUF: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: FUJHF and GNZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUJHF: 30% vs. GNZUF: 125%
Market capitalization -- FUJHF: $15.11B vs. GNZUF: $10.75B
FUJHF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $15.11B. GNZUF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $10.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.49T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUJHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGNZUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUJHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GNZUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUJHF is a better buy in the long-term than GNZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUJHF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNZUF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUJHF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GNZUF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNZUF is a better buy in the short-term than FUJHF.

Price Growth

FUJHF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +5.18% price change this week, while GNZUF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +12.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.50% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUJHF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than GNZUF($10.8B). GNZUF has higher P/E ratio than FUJHF: GNZUF (33.21) vs FUJHF (9.51). FUJHF YTD gains are higher at: 31.471 vs. GNZUF (17.131). FUJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 808B vs. GNZUF (4.38B). FUJHF has more cash in the bank: 1.85T vs. GNZUF (42B). GNZUF has less debt than FUJHF: GNZUF (28B) vs FUJHF (400B). FUJHF has higher revenues than GNZUF: FUJHF (4.76T) vs GNZUF (104B).
FUJHFGNZUFFUJHF / GNZUF
Capitalization15.1B10.8B140%
EBITDA808B4.38B18,443%
Gain YTD31.47117.131184%
P/E Ratio9.5133.2129%
Revenue4.76T104B4,573%
Total Cash1.85T42B4,400%
Total Debt400B28B1,429%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUJHF vs GNZUF: Fundamental Ratings
FUJHF
GNZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUJHF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (40). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (100). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNZUF (92). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GNZUF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FUJHF (43). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

GNZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FUJHF (7). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUJHFGNZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUJHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GNZUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOXY60.690.87
+1.45%
YieldMax Target 12 Smcndctr Opt Inc ETF
IVRS38.490.27
+0.71%
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
HERD43.870.12
+0.29%
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
EBND21.230.04
+0.17%
SPDR® Blmbg Em Mkts Lcl Bd ETF
IDUB24.010.04
+0.16%
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF

FUJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJHF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJHF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUJHF
1D Price
Change %
FUJHF100%
N/A
HMC - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
F - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
TM - FUJHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
GELYF - FUJHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLLY - FUJHF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GNZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNZUF and FUJHY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNZUF and FUJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNZUF
1D Price
Change %
GNZUF100%
N/A
FUJHY - GNZUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLLY - GNZUF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLLF - GNZUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJHF - GNZUF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GELYF - GNZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More