FUJHF
Price
$17.13
Change
+$0.87 (+5.35%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.48B
GNZUF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.04 (-10.81%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
14.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUJHF vs GNZUF

Header iconFUJHF vs GNZUF Comparison
Open Charts FUJHF vs GNZUFBanner chart's image
Subaru
Price$17.13
Change+$0.87 (+5.35%)
Volume$835
Capitalization14.48B
Guangzhou Automobile Group
Price$0.33
Change-$0.04 (-10.81%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization14.09B
FUJHF vs GNZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUJHF vs. GNZUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUJHF is a Hold and GNZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FUJHF: $17.13 vs. GNZUF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: FUJHF and GNZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUJHF: 43% vs. GNZUF: 50%
Market capitalization -- FUJHF: $14.48B vs. GNZUF: $14.09B
FUJHF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $14.48B. GNZUF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $14.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUJHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGNZUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GNZUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUJHF and GNZUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUJHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNZUF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUJHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GNZUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUJHF is a better buy in the short-term than GNZUF.

Price Growth

FUJHF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while GNZUF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -15.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.83% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUJHF($14.5B) and GNZUF($14.1B) have the same market capitalization . FUJHF has higher P/E ratio than GNZUF: FUJHF (10.53) vs GNZUF (7.06). FUJHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.735 vs. GNZUF (-24.223). FUJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 544B vs. GNZUF (6.11B). FUJHF has more cash in the bank: 1.37T vs. GNZUF (38.8B). GNZUF has less debt than FUJHF: GNZUF (21.2B) vs FUJHF (313B). FUJHF has higher revenues than GNZUF: FUJHF (3.77T) vs GNZUF (113B).
FUJHFGNZUFFUJHF / GNZUF
Capitalization14.5B14.1B103%
EBITDA544B6.11B8,902%
Gain YTD0.735-24.223-3%
P/E Ratio10.537.06149%
Revenue3.77T113B3,340%
Total Cash1.37T38.8B3,526%
Total Debt313B21.2B1,476%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUJHF vs GNZUF: Fundamental Ratings
FUJHF
GNZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5091
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7983
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
752
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUJHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (34). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (100). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNZUF (90). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (83). This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GNZUF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUJHF (75). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUJHFGNZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATGE128.493.11
+2.48%
Adtalem Global Education
TREX54.881.32
+2.46%
Trex Company
CLFD42.490.60
+1.43%
Clearfield
PBM5.11N/A
N/A
Psyence Biomedical Ltd
XOS3.02-0.02
-0.66%
Xos

FUJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJHF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJHF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUJHF
1D Price
Change %
FUJHF100%
N/A
HMC - FUJHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
GWLLF - FUJHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNDAF - FUJHF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNZUF - FUJHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-11.45%
GELYF - FUJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
More

GNZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNZUF and NIU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNZUF and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNZUF
1D Price
Change %
GNZUF100%
-11.45%
NIU - GNZUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJHF - GNZUF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLLY - GNZUF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
GELYF - GNZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
GWLLF - GNZUF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More