FUFU
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.14 (-5.30%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
416.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUT
Price
$49.64
Change
-$3.16 (-5.98%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUFU vs HUT

Header iconFUFU vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts FUFU vs HUTBanner chart's image
BitFuFu
Price$2.50
Change-$0.14 (-5.30%)
Volume$67.99K
Capitalization416.21M
Hut 8
Price$49.64
Change-$3.16 (-5.98%)
Volume$4.42M
Capitalization5.36B
FUFU vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUFU vs. HUT commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUFU is a Hold and HUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FUFU: $2.50 vs. HUT: $49.64)
Brand notoriety: FUFU and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUFU: 29% vs. HUT: 55%
Market capitalization -- FUFU: $416.21M vs. HUT: $5.36B
FUFU [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $416.21M. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than FUFU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUFU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUFU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than FUFU.

Price Growth

FUFU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.21% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +12.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($5.36B) has a higher market cap than FUFU($416M). HUT has higher P/E ratio than FUFU: HUT (25.59) vs FUFU (6.41). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 142.265 vs. FUFU (-49.495). HUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 453M vs. FUFU (77.6M). HUT (33.5M) and FUFU (32.6M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FUFU has less debt than HUT: FUFU (40.5M) vs HUT (391M). HUT has higher revenues than FUFU: HUT (668M) vs FUFU (473M).
FUFUHUTFUFU / HUT
Capitalization416M5.36B8%
EBITDA77.6M453M17%
Gain YTD-49.495142.265-35%
P/E Ratio6.4125.5925%
Revenue473M668M71%
Total Cash32.6M33.5M97%
Total Debt40.5M391M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUFUHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUFU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSIEX22.020.03
+0.14%
JPMorgan International Equity I
GIDAX8.790.01
+0.11%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem A
AVDNX15.570.01
+0.06%
Avantis® International Equity G
VSCCX14.67-0.05
-0.34%
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend C
MSVEX6.61-0.03
-0.45%
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio A

FUFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUFU has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUFU jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUFU
1D Price
Change %
FUFU100%
-5.30%
COIN - FUFU
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
HOOD - FUFU
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
HUT - FUFU
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.98%
HIVE - FUFU
37%
Loosely correlated
-4.56%
RIOT - FUFU
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
More

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-5.98%
CIFR - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-6.35%
RIOT - HUT
75%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
IREN - HUT
72%
Closely correlated
-4.00%
COIN - HUT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
CLSK - HUT
70%
Closely correlated
-4.30%
More