Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VMCPX
FTZFX vs VMCPX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VMCPX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$55.08
Change-$1.14 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.23M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index InstitutionalPlus
Price$385.48
Change-$0.94 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
FTZFX vs VMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VMCPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a StrongBuy and VMCPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMCPX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. FTZFX (242M). VMCPX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VMCPX (1.51) vs FTZFX (0.17). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VMCPX: FTZFX (7 years) vs VMCPX (15 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VMCPX (0.03). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VMCPX (16.00). FTZFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMCPX: FTZFX (1000000) vs VMCPX (100000000). VMCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. FTZFX (11.54). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.52 vs. VMCPX (62.30).
| FTZFX | VMCPX | FTZFX / VMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.03 | 3,033% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.03 | 3,800% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.831 | 8.316 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 242M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.51 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | 14.33 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.04 | 26.46 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.52 | 62.30 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement