Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VIMSX
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$55.36
Change+$0.67 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.12M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. FTZFX (236M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTZFX (0.18). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZFX (7 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FTZFX (15.83). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 109.01 vs. VIMSX (70.78).
| FTZFX | VIMSX | FTZFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.17 | 671% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.379 | 9.818 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 192B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.83 | 17.91 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.37 | 42.07 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.01 | 70.78 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement