Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VIMSX
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$51.94
Change-$0.98 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.09M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$74.01
Change-$0.86 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
FTZFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTZFX (213M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTZFX (0.18). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). VIMSX (11.58) and FTZFX (11.52) have marching annual gain over last year. FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 108.21 vs. VIMSX (69.57).
| FTZFX | VIMSX | FTZFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.17 | 671% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.684 | 2.751 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.52 | 11.58 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.31 | 39.11 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.21 | 69.57 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement