Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VIMAX
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$57.37
Change+$0.40 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.13M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$362.22
Change+$3.99 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. FTZFX (264M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMAX (1.47) vs FTZFX (0.17). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZFX (7 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMAX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. VIMAX (11.60). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.66 vs. VIMAX (70.93).
| FTZFX | VIMAX | FTZFX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.05 | 1,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.314 | 10.884 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.47 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 11.60 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.82 | 55.85 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.66 | 70.93 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 161.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement