Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZFX vs VIMAX
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZFX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$51.94
Change-$0.98 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.09M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$335.74
Change-$3.91 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
FTZFX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZFX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZFX is a StrongBuy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTZFX (213M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: VIMAX (1.52) vs FTZFX (0.18). FTZFX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZFX (6 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). VIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: VIMAX (3000) vs FTZFX (1000000). VIMAX (11.60) and FTZFX (11.52) have marching annual gain over last year. FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 108.21 vs. VIMAX (69.70).
| FTZFX | VIMAX | FTZFX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.05 | 1,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.684 | 2.778 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.52 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.52 | 11.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.31 | 39.15 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.21 | 69.70 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement