Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZCX vs VIMSX
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZCX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
Price$50.73
Change-$0.99 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.09M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$74.01
Change-$0.86 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTZCX (213M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTZCX (0.00). FTZCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZCX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FTZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). FTZCX (12.04) and VIMSX (11.58) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FTZCX | VIMSX | FTZCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.17 | 1,241% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.278 | 2.751 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.04 | 11.58 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.51 | 39.11 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 69.57 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.00 | - |