Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZCX vs VIMSX
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZCX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
Price$53.79
Change-$1.14 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.23M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.00
Change-$0.19 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. FTZCX (242M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: VIMSX (1.37) vs FTZCX (0.00). FTZCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZCX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FTZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.31 vs. FTZCX (10.88).
| FTZCX | VIMSX | FTZCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.17 | 1,241% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.387 | 8.291 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 242M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 14.31 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.42 | 26.39 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 62.16 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement